fshy

Home

TeraBox

terabox.com · 3 records in Netdisk and pan, Storage · JSON

Records 3

www.terabox.comCloud drivestorage/teraboxJSONcomparereport an error

Sibling records disagree:

Free allowance
1024 GB free ('Network disk capacity limited to 1024GB' on the free column; '1TB Free Cloud Storage for Basic & 2TB Storage for Pro'); Premium/Pro 2048 GB
Verdict
★ qualifiesusable as stated; the read path was probed
Cost
free tier
Identity
institution?placeholder, not evidence; card unknown, phone unknown
Binding limit
per-object-cap4 GB/file
Evidence
reported4 sources; a third party said so
Freshness
stale on 2026-11-05checked 2026-10-21 (inherited); stale on 2026-11-05
Free tier1024 GB free ('Network disk capacity limited to 1024GB' on the free column; '1TB Free Cloud Storage for Basic & 2TB Storage for Pro'); Premium/Pro 2048 GB
unit GB; metered on stored-bytes
Pricenone stated
Limits
  • per-object-cap (binding) 4 GB/file source
~4 GB/file free; ~7-day share-link life; one concurrent download; first-party web login carries a jsToken automated-traffic filter layer
Identityinstitution (inferred, not read) not published
EgressDirect share links, no per-GB fee; free accounts throttled (~2-5 GB/day measured by third parties) and one download at a time
Per-object cap4 GB/file (4000000000 bytes)
Retention~4 GB/file free; ~7-day share-link life; one concurrent download; first-party web login carries a jsToken automated-traffic filter layer (7 days)
Interfacerest, rclone rest
ToolingUnofficial web API (app_id=250528, jsToken) + rclone fork bclone / gulp79/rclone-extra (upstream PR #8508 still open); official Open Platform OAuth is partner-gated
Composes with1 TB per account, and a second account carries a second allowance; email/SSO signup keeps identity cost low, but the 4 GB/file free cap forces splitting
Reliabilityno official rclone backend; free-tier daily download cap makes it archive-shaped, and the web API breaks when the client changes
Parsed numbers
  • has-free-tier 1
  • per-object-cap 4 GB
Evidence 4
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-21www.terabox.com/cloud-storage-pricing-plans'Network disk capacity limited to 1024GB' free column; title '1TB Free Cloud Storage for Basic & 2TB Storage for Pro'
2026-10-21www.terabox.com/portuguese/cloud-storage-pricing-plansand /thai/ and /vietnamese/ and /indonesian/ — all show '1024 GB' free, 2048 GB paid; the '5GB ... gratuito' strings belong to the OneDrive/Google Drive comparison rows
2026-10-21www.terabox.com/logincrawl render shows 'Sign in with Google', 'Phone or Email', 'Registered with phone No.?'; raw HTML carries thirdLoginSdk {apple, kakao, google, line, facebook} and a dial-code phone widget
2026-10-21dm.1024terabox.com/api/quota?...&app_id=250528probe: GET -> {"errmsg":"user not login","errno":-6}
Unknown values 2
  • per object cap notes: the field may be stated in a source that was not read
  • retention notes: the field may be stated in a source that was not read

TeraBox (terabox.com)

Netdisk and pan

www.terabox.com/Consumer pannetdisk-pan/teraboxJSONcomparereport an error

Free allowance
1024 GB of free cloud storage on registration
Verdict
caveatusable, with a named limit or an unprobed read path
Cost
free tier
Identity
emailno card, phone required
Binding limit
per-object-cap128 GB per shared file as stated in the app listing
Evidence
reported5 sources; a third party said so
Freshness
stale on 2026-11-19checked 2026-11-04 (live); stale on 2026-11-19
Free tier1024 GB of free cloud storage on registration
unit GB; metered on stored-bytes; the official site title and the app store listing both state 1024GB free
Pricenone stated
Limits
  • per-object-cap (binding) 128 GB per shared file as stated in the app listing source
Bindingper-object-cap The 1 TiB quota is not the constraint; the absence of a documented programmatic interface and of a readable limits page is, because neither the cap nor the retention could be established first-hand.
Identityemail registration is stated to be by email or phone through the app
Egressrecorded as metered:false because no per-GB price or cap was found, which is an absence of evidence and not evidence of absence
Per-object cap128 GB per upload is stated for Premium users on the vendor page; the free plan's per-file upload cap is unverified: not stated on the page read
Interfacerest
Toolingno official public API documented; the OpenList project ships a reverse-engineered TeraBox driver that authenticates with a browser session cookie and is not maintained, so a reverse-engineered client mounts it with…
Composes with1 TiB free is the largest single-tier free quota in the consumer set, but every route to it is either an app or an undocumented API
Notes1024 GB free is stated by the official site title and by the app store listing. The per-file cap of 128 GB is the app listing's sharing figure and is not the same thing as an upload cap. What could not be established: retention, egress terms, and whether an anonymous or email-only registration produces a usable account. The site returned a verification interstitial to the reader on 2026-10-22, so this is reported and not documented.
Parsed numbers
  • has-free-tier 1
  • per-object-cap 128 GB
Evidence 5
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-22www.terabox.com/the page title and meta description returned by the reader were 'TeraBox - Free Cloud Storage Up To 1 TB, Send Large Files Online', and the final URL was /simple-verify with the body 'Verification code was entered incorrectly', so the landing page itself was not served
2026-10-22play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en_US&id=com.dubox.dri'1024GB of FREE Cloud Storage' on registration, and 'Upload, store, and share big files up to 128 GB seamlessly'
2026-11-03www.terabox.com/the vendor landing page, read through a firecrawl pin, states 1024 GB of cloud storage
2026-11-03www.terabox.com/the 128 GB upload figure applies to Premium users, so it is not the free plan's cap
2026-11-03doc.oplist.org/guide/drivers/teraboxthe OpenList TeraBox driver is reverse-engineered and not actively maintained
More fields 3
access moderegistration-gated
official apinot documented
third party drivers["Cloudreve","AList/OpenList"]

www.terabox.com/indonesianstorage/terabox-2JSONcomparereport an error

Sibling records disagree:

Free allowance
Same 1 TB as everywhere else, and the localised pages are the interesting part: the /indonesian URL now redirects to /simple-verify with a 'Verification code was entered incorrectly' stub…
Verdict
fails: identitythe identity required is not reachable without it
Cost
not stated
Identity
email?placeholder, not evidence; card unknown, phone unknown
Binding limit
noneno named constraint binds
Evidence
reported3 sources; a third party said so
Freshness
stale on 2026-11-05checked 2026-10-21 (inherited); stale on 2026-11-05
Free tierSame 1 TB as everywhere else, and the localised pages are the interesting part: the /indonesian URL now redirects to /simple-verify with a 'Verification code was entered incorrectly' stub…
unit none; metered on none
Pricenone stated
Identityemail (placeholder) not published
Egressnot recorded
Interfaceunknown
Toolingnot recorded
Evidence 3
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-21www.terabox.com/indonesianthe text of Free tier, above
2026-10-21www.terabox.com/englishcited as the basis of the rejection: Same 1 TB as everywhere else, and the localised pages are the interesting part: the /indonesian URL now redirects to /simple-verify with a 'Verification code was entered incorrectly' stub, a
2026-10-21bokgoon.com/free-cloud-storage-services/cited as the basis of the rejection: Same 1 TB as everywhere else, and the localised pages are the interesting part: the /indonesian URL now redirects to /simple-verify with a 'Verification code was entered incorrectly' stub, a
More fields 1
dead end{"failure_class": "identity","why": "Same 1 TB as everywhere else, and the localised pages are the interesting part: the /indonesian URL now redirects to /simple-verify with a 'Verification code was entered incorrectly' stub…","retry_when": "if the registration gate opens to a foreign individual","first_recorded": "2026-10-21"}
Unknown values 7
  • chaining: no value was recorded for this field
  • egress terms: no value was recorded for this field
  • interface: the access interface was not established
  • per object cap notes: no value was recorded for this field
  • per object cap stated: no value was recorded for this field
  • retention stated: no value was recorded for this field
  • tooling: no value was recorded for this field