fshy

Home / Compute

Layer.ae

vpspricetracker.com/provider/Layer_ae/vpsCloud VMcompute/layer-aeJSONcomparereport an errorprovider JSON

Free allowance
USD 24.99/month: 2 Ryzen cores (shared), 8,192 MB RAM, 200 GB NVMe, 12,000 GB/month bandwidth, 10 Gbps port, IPv4 and IPv6, Spokane Washington USA.
Verdict
paidno free allowance; listed for its price
Cost
no price stated
Identity
email?placeholder, not evidence; card unknown, phone unknown
Binding limit
volume-quota12,000 GB a month, which is the wall rather than the 10 Gbps port; the per-TB overage price is not stated on the pages read, and the 200 GB NVMe is the disk limit
Evidence
reported3 sources; a third party said so
Freshness
stale on 2026-11-06checked 2026-10-22 (live); stale on 2026-11-06
Free tierUSD 24.99/month: 2 Ryzen cores (shared), 8,192 MB RAM, 200 GB NVMe, 12,000 GB/month bandwidth, 10 Gbps port, IPv4 and IPv6, Spokane Washington USA. This is the only offer on the page with an order link. The headline cheapest plan, USD 1.67/month on a USD 20.00 a year term, for 1 core, 512 MB RAM, 10 GB NVMe and 500 GB/month in Spokane, Coventry and Eygelshoven, has no order link on any of its three cards; the USD 14.99 and USD 19.99 cards are also without one.
unit GiB; metered on wall-clock; none
Pricenone stated
Limits
  • volume-quota (binding) 12,000 GB a month, which is the wall rather than the 10 Gbps port; the per-TB overage price is not stated on the pages read, and the 200 GB NVMe is the disk limit source
Identityemail (placeholder) not stated
Egress12,000 GB a month included per the tracker card (free_allowance is in GB a month); overage price and throttling policy are not stated on the pages read
free allowance: 12000
Interfaceunknown inferred from the tooling the provider documents; not probed
Toolingclient area and server status at my.layer.ae; the storefront is a JavaScript application whose plan table did not render, so no vendor price was read; a 10 Gbps port on the orderable plan
Composes withUSD 24.99 is an entry price rather than a cheap tier: Luxvps sells 4 GB for EUR 4.50 and Layer7 sells 6 GB for EUR 4.90, so the reason to pick this host is the 200 GB disk and the 12 TB allowance, not the compute; the USD 1.67 annual plan that makes the provider interesting is not orderable from the page, so the cheap end needs the client area
Reliabilityno reliability event recorded
NotesThe tracker's headline price of $1.67 a month describes a plan with no order link in all three locations, so the record is the USD 24.99 plan and the page's own starting price is not buyable. The vendor site is a single-page application and layer.ae/pricing is a 404, so confidence stays reported.
Parsed numbers
  • has-free-tier 0
  • volume-quota 12000 GB / month
Evidence 3
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-22vpspricetracker.com/provider/Layer_ae/vpscard quoted: '$24.99 / month', '2 Ryzen Cores (shared)', '8,192 MB RAM', '200 GB NVMe', '12,000 GB/month bandwidth', '10 Gbps port speed', 'Spokane Washington U.S.A.'; it is the only offer with a live order link: three of the 12 cards carry one and all three are this same plan. The page's lead line reads 'These are the cheapest VPSs currently offered by Layer.ae, starting at $20.00 per year'
2026-10-22vpspricetracker.com/provider/Layer_ae/vpsthe three cheapest cards quoted as '$1.67 / month', 'yearly Service', '1 Ryzen Cores (shared)', '512 MB RAM', '10 GB NVMe', '500 GB/month bandwidth', '10 Gbps port speed', in Spokane, Coventry and Eygelshoven; each renders its Go control as a span with class 'button_disabled' and carries no order link
2026-10-22layer.ae/the marketing site is a JavaScript single-page application (asset bundle /assets/index-BkzgDGeX.css, no price text in the served HTML); the client area is at my.layer.ae and layer.ae/pricing returns a 404 page reading 'Oops! Page not found'
More fields 1
facets{"class": null,"free_tier_kind": "none","shape": {"vcpu": 2,"ram_gib": 8,"disk_gib": 200,"gpu_class": null,"gpu_count": null}}
Unknown values 5
  • identity cost detail: a source was read and is silent on this field
  • interface: the access interface was not established
  • per object cap stated: the field does not apply to this kind of offer
  • reliability note: nothing of this kind was observed
  • retention stated: the field does not apply to this kind of offer