juicefs community edition as an n-bucket pool

Free allowance: A single JuiceFS volume binds to exactly ONE object-storage endpoint; multi-bucket/multi-provider backend has been an open feature request since 2021-04-23 and is still open with no…
Verdict: self-hosted, last resortverdict fails-quota: the free allowance is too small to matter. Self-hosted options are listed last, because this site is for users who have no hardware.
Cost: not stated
Identity: email?placeholder, not evidence; card unknown, phone unknown
Binding limit: noneno named constraint binds
Evidence: reported2 sources; a third party said so
Freshness: stale on 2026-11-05checked 2026-10-21 (inherited); stale on 2026-11-05

Free tier	A single JuiceFS volume binds to exactly ONE object-storage endpoint; multi-bucket/multi-provider backend has been an open feature request since 2021-04-23 and is still open with no… unit none; metered on none
Price	none stated
Identity	email (placeholder) not published
Egress	not recorded
Interface	unknown
Tooling	not recorded

Evidence 2

date	source	what it proved
2026-10-21	github.com/juicedata/juicefs/issues/345	the text of Free tier, above
2026-10-21	github.com/juicedata/juicefs/discussions/5153	cited as the basis of the rejection: A single JuiceFS volume binds to exactly ONE object-storage endpoint; multi-bucket/multi-provider backend has been an open feature request since 2021-04-23 and is still open with no implemen

More fields 1

dead end	`{"failure_class": "quota","why": "A single JuiceFS volume binds to exactly ONE object-storage endpoint; multi-bucket/multi-provider backend has been an open feature request since 2021-04-23 and is still open with no…","retry_when": null,"first_recorded": "2026-10-21"}`

Unknown values 7