fshy

Home / Netdisk and pan

115 and Google team-drive rentals (the resale market)

www.nodeseek.com/post-963458-1Resale marketnetdisk-pan/115-team-drive-rentalJSONcomparereport an errorprovider JSON

Free allowance
Not a free tier: a rented Google team drive at CNY 20 per month, six months minimum, with unlimited space, a 400,000-file cap and a 750 GB per day upload cap
Verdict
paidno free allowance; listed for its price
Cost
no price stated
Identity
cardcard required, no phone
Binding limit
request-rate750 GB per day upload per drive; 2.5 TB per day for a whole rented domain
Evidence
reported4 sources; a third party said so
Freshness
stale on 2026-11-06checked 2026-10-22 (live); stale on 2026-11-06
Free tiernot a free tier: a rented Google team drive at CNY 20 per month, six months minimum, with unlimited space, a 400,000-file cap and a 750 GB per day upload cap
unit unlimited; metered on uploaded-bytes
Pricenone stated
Limits
  • per-object-cap 400,000 files per drive source
  • request-rate (binding) 750 GB per day upload per drive; 2.5 TB per day for a whole rented domain source
Bindingrequest-rate The space is nominally unlimited and the file count is 400,000; what actually bounds a day's work is the 750 GB per day upload cap, and what bounds the arrangement is that the tenant belongs to somebody else.
Identitycard CNY 20 per month, six months minimum, paid to an individual seller; the identity gate is the payment, not a registration
Egressdownloads are stated as unlimited by one seller; uploads are capped at 750 GB per day per drive
Per-object cap400,000 files per drive, stated by the seller
Retentionthe drive lasts as long as the underlying tenant does; the seller states no refund if the plan disappears, and one thread carries a buyer reporting that the drive vanished
Interfacerest, rclone
Toolinga Google Drive API client or rclone; the rental is a permission on a shared drive, not a new protocol
Composes withthe cheapest route to a pooled tenant that already exists, and the clearest evidence that an 'unlimited' Google quota is a quota being arbitraged by somebody else
ReliabilityThe underlying tenant is the failure point and the renter does not control it: one thread's own replies describe unlimited Workspace space as a bug-based expansion, and another carries a buyer reporting that the team drive vanished. No refund on a mid-term exit is stated in every listing read.
NotesFour listings on one forum between 2024-05 and 2026-10 quote CNY 15 to 20 per month for unlimited Google team-drive space with a 400,000-file cap and a 750 GB per day upload cap, and two of the threads argue about whether the space is a genuine plan or an expansion bug. Where a rental market exists, the underlying unlimited quota is being arbitraged, and the arbitrageur's account is what fails.
Evidence notereported the date on each evidence row is the day the post was read (2026-10-22); the post's own publication date is carried inside the proved string, because a forum post describes a moment and its age is a property of the claim and not of the reading
Parsed numbers
  • has-free-tier 0
  • request-rate 750 GB / day
Evidence 4
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-22www.nodeseek.com/post-963458-1a seller offers '20 元/月,半年起租', '无限空间,单盘最多 40 万个文件', '每天上传额度 750 GB', and a whole rented domain at '每个域每天上传额度 2.5 TB' (posted 2026-10-04)
2026-10-22www.nodeseek.com/post-805440-1the same seller's earlier listing at the same price and the same caps, 110 days before, so the offer is repeatable and not a one-off (posted 2026-07-03)
2026-10-22www.nodeseek.com/post-353802-1a different seller at '月付20块,半年起付' with '文件个数40w个,每天上传流量750G,下载不限', which corroborates both caps independently (posted 2025-06-01)
2026-10-22www.nodeseek.com/post-805440-2a reply argues '200T的workspace都是卡bug扩容的', so at least one buyer believes the unlimited space is an expansion bug rather than a plan (posted 2026-07-13)
More fields 6
access modepaid-pan
marketnodeseek.com transaction board
listings seen4
price range cny month15 to 20
file cap400000
upload cap gb day750